Signature.getAlogrithm return null in special case
Brad Wetmore
bradford.wetmore at oracle.com
Tue Jun 18 00:44:43 UTC 2013
On 6/17/2013 5:38 PM, Brad Wetmore wrote:
> Pushed. Thanks for the contribution.
P.S. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/116050227ee9
Brad
> Brad
>
>
> On 5/27/2013 12:11 PM, Brad Wetmore wrote:
>> Hi Deven,
>>
>> I just got back from a short break, hope to return back to this shortly.
>>
>> I tweaked your test a bit before I left, but the builds were failing
>> (unrelated issue) so I couldn't check in. Still need to check the
>> actual Signature code for a couple things, but I think it's ok.
>>
>> Brad
>>
>>
>> On 5/21/2013 2:07 AM, Deven You wrote:
>>> Hi Brad,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your reply, is there any progress on this problem?
>>>
>>> I see the last comments on JDK-8014620 is six days before.
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>
>>> On 05/15/2013 08:28 AM, Brad Wetmore wrote:
>>>> Offhand, this seems reasonable.
>>>>
>>>> Since you are an OpenJDK author, I've filed:
>>>>
>>>> JDK-8014620: Signature.getAlogrithm return null in special case
>>>>
>>>> and stocked it with your patch.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Brad
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/13/2013 9:46 PM, Deven You wrote:
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I find in a special case: If you create a SignatureSpi service through
>>>>> extending Signature rather than SignatureSpi, the returned signature
>>>>> instance will lose its algortithm name.
>>>>>
>>>>> Though the fix[1] is simple I think it's valuable. Could anyone take
>>>>> a look?
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~youdwei/ojdk-809/webrev/
>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eyoudwei/ojdk-809/webrev/>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks a lot
>>>>
>>>
More information about the security-dev
mailing list