[9] review request for 6977937: The SunJCE PBKDF2KeyImpl is requiring the MAC instance also be from SunJCE.

Bradford Wetmore bradford.wetmore at oracle.com
Mon Apr 7 19:21:21 UTC 2014




On 4/5/2014 8:00 AM, Vincent Ryan wrote:
>
> I was concerned about the impact on applications of a different JCE
> provider being selected instead of SunJCE, on some platforms.
>
> I can change the fix to follow the standard JCE provider ordering.

That would be my preference, but I can see both sides if someone has a 
strong case.

Brad


>
> On 04/04/2014 22:23, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
>> With the current and proposed code, you are effectively requiring the
>> MAC come from JCE, as all the algorithms exist in SunJCE.
>>
>> IIRC, when we discussed the previous change in this area, the idea was
>> that the MAC would follow the standard JCA provider priority ordering.
>>
>> Brad
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/4/2014 8:45 AM, Vincent Ryan wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Please review the following fix to remove the requirement for the Mac
>>> algorithm used by a PBKDF2 algorithm to be supplied by the SunJCE
>>> provider.
>>> The SunJCE provider is still preferred (for compatibility with
>>> previous releases and for performance reasons) but it is no longer
>>> required.
>>> The com.sun.crypto.provider.PBKDF2KeyImpl class first searches SunJCE
>>> for the required Mac algorithm but fails over to searching the
>>> other installed JCE providers too.
>>>
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6977937
>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vinnie/6977937/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>


More information about the security-dev mailing list