Code review request, 8037557 test timeout

Xuelei Fan at
Thu Apr 10 12:45:04 UTC 2014

On 4/10/2014 8:42 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
> The code change looks harmless, but I am not sure how it could provide
> more information next time.
Next time, with accept timeout and read timeout, we would know on which
point the threads is more easier to get timeout.


> --Max
> On 4/10/2014 20:17, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Please review this test case update:
>> This is a test timeout issue.  Cause is still unknown.  I guess that one
>> or more of the server threads had not yet been scheduled to run by the
>> system within the timeout of the testing.  I added more timeout in the
>> code.  Hope next time timeout failure, we can get more information.
>> Thanks,
>> Xuelei

More information about the security-dev mailing list