RFR 8036779: sun.security.krb5.KdcComm interprets kdc_timeout asmsec instead of sec
Wang Weijun
weijun.wang at oracle.com
Sun May 18 02:06:30 UTC 2014
How about this? I will support "s" and "ms" units ("ms" is not defined by other vendors though). But will still try to be a little smart when there is no unit.
--Max
On May 15, 2014, at 10:09, Xuelei Fan <xuelei.fan at oracle.com> wrote:
> The actual problem is, what if I want to use 121 seconds? It is a
> possible timeout value in practice.
>
>>
>> If we just change to sec it is a big compatibility issue. User won't
>> notice any error report expect finding their app runs much slower.
>>
> Then I would suggest to declare it as a known issue, and suggest to use
> explicit spec in practice.
More information about the security-dev
mailing list