[9] RFR: 8037550: Update RFC references in javadoc to RFC 5280

[Wang Weijun]

Hi Jason

The change looks quite straightforward, but have you checked if our codes actually comply with RFC 5280 especially for those areas where RFC 5280 is different from RFC 3280? http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#page-5 lists the differences. For example, there is an item:

      * Section 4.2.1.5 recommends marking the policy mappings extension
        as critical.  RFC 3280 required that the policy mappings
        extension be marked as non-critical.

In PolicyMappingsExtension.java, the 2 constructors that generate a PolicyMappingsExtension object both set critical to false. Is this something we should reconsider?

Thanks
Max

On Sep 19, 2014, at 9:27, Jason Uh <jason.uh at oracle.com> wrote:

> Please review this changeset, which updates references to RFC 3280 to RFC 5280. RFC 5280 has obsoleted 3280.
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/8037550/webrev.03/
> 
> Thanks,
> Jason