RFR JDK-8134364: Add defensive copies to get/set methods for OCSPNonceExtension
Jamil Nimeh
jamil.j.nimeh at oracle.com
Sat Aug 29 01:25:13 UTC 2015
Hello all,
I've removed the CertAttrSet interface from OCSPNonceExtension and
trimmed away a few unneeded methods. As a result the class is immutable
now.
JBS Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8134364
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jnimeh/reviews/8134364/webrev.01
Thanks,
--Jamil
On 08/25/2015 08:11 AM, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> Yes, I was just following Extension convention in terms of
> implementing CertAttrSet. Within sun.security.x509, X509CertInfo uses
> the set methods from other objects implementing CertAttrSet. But
> OCSPNonceExtension really isn't a certificate attribute so it probably
> doesn't need to bring this interface in.
>
> I'll refactor this and alter the tests to match.
>
> --Jamil
>
> On 08/25/2015 06:40 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Is it necessary for the class to implement CertAttrSet? I realize all
>> of the internal X.509 extensions implement that, but that was done a
>> long time ago and not something we really want to carry forward if
>> not needed. I think it would be cleaner not to do that as it would
>> more easily allow you to make the class immutable, and would allow
>> you to remove the set method.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sean
>>
>> On 08/25/2015 04:14 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>>> OCSPNonceExtension.java
>>> =======================
>>> - nonceData = (byte[])obj;
>>> + nonceData = ((byte[])obj).clone();
>>>
>>> Do you want to check null obj?
>>>
>>> - return nonceData;
>>> + return (nonceData != null ? nonceData.clone() : null);
>>>
>>> I think you may want to enclose the "!=" operator as:
>>>
>>> + return (nonceData != null) ? nonceData.clone() : null;
>>>
>>>
>>> Xuelei
>>>
>>> On 8/25/2015 12:55 PM, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> This is a quick fix to the OCSPNonceExtension class to add a couple
>>>> defensive copies to public get/set methods.
>>>>
>>>> JBS Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8134364
>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jnimeh/reviews/8134364/webrev.00
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> --Jamil
>>>
>
More information about the security-dev
mailing list