RFR: (s) 8130696: Security Providers need to have their version numbers updated for JDK 9

Sean Mullan sean.mullan at oracle.com
Thu Jul 9 16:23:08 UTC 2015


The Version variable on line 73 of S11N.java should be all lowercase:

   int version = Integer.valueOf(v);

otherwise it should not compile.

--Sean

On 07/08/2015 11:57 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Hi Iris
>
> The change to S11N.java looks fine.
>
> Thanks
> Max
>
> On 07/08/2015 01:48 AM, Iris Clark wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Please review changes to resolve the following bug:
>>
>> 8130696: Security Providers need to have their version numbers updated
>> for JDK 9 (Verona)
>>
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130696
>>
>> Changeset:  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iris/verona/8130696/webrev
>>
>> The constructor invocation for every Provider implementation contains a
>> hard-coded value for the version, "1.9d", which it compares to
>> java.specification.version.  Verona [0,1] changes the system property
>> from "1.9" to "9".  The provider’s version should be changed to “9.0d”.
>>
>> Many regression tests in the jdk repository fail due to this bug.  Test
>> groups with failing tests detecting this problem include jdk_security,
>> jdk_management, jdk_jmx, and jdk_net.  These tests now pass.  I have
>> verified that all providers modified by 8030823 [2] have been updated.
>>
>> After review, the changeset will be pushed to verona/stage [3]. The
>> changeset will go to jdk9/dev when Verona is complete later this summer.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Iris
>>
>> [0] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/verona
>>
>> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/223
>>
>> [2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/f1066af06fa0
>>
>> [3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/verona/stage
>>


More information about the security-dev mailing list