JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8083436: Doclint regression introduced by JDK-8043758
Bradford Wetmore
bradford.wetmore at oracle.com
Thu Jun 4 00:45:03 UTC 2015
Or I think you could also just remove the args, since there is only one
compareUnsigned currently. Probably safer to use long, long.
Brad
On 6/3/2015 4:06 PM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please review the patch below to address a recently introduced doclint
> regression.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Joe
>
> diff -r 5f952ade41ff
> src/java.base/share/classes/javax/net/ssl/SSLEngineResult.java
> --- a/src/java.base/share/classes/javax/net/ssl/SSLEngineResult.java Wed
> Jun 03 14:35:17 2015 -0700
> +++ b/src/java.base/share/classes/javax/net/ssl/SSLEngineResult.java Wed
> Jun 03 16:04:22 2015 -0700
> @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@
> * @apiNote Note that sequence number is an unsigned long and cannot
> * exceed {@code -1L}. It is desired to use the unsigned
> * long comparing mode for comparison of unsigned long
> values
> - * (see also {@link java.lang.Long#compareUnsigned()
> + * (see also {@link java.lang.Long#compareUnsigned(long,
> long)
> * Long.compareUnsigned()}).
> * <P>
> * For DTLS protocols, the first 16 bits of the sequence
> @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@
> * record; or ${@code -1L} if no record is produced or
> consumed,
> * or this operation is not supported by the underlying
> provider
> *
> - * @see java.lang.Long#compareUnsigned(boolean, boolean)
> + * @see java.lang.Long#compareUnsigned(long, long)
> *
> * @since 1.9
> */
>
More information about the security-dev
mailing list