RFR: [Update 2] 8074064 : OCSPResponse.SingleResponse objects do not parse singleExtensions

[Jamil Nimeh]

One more round of updates.  Only the test code and the test inputs have 
changed.  Test input is now Base64 format, with comment headers that 
display the OCSP response pretty-print (or an asn1parse of the 
BasicOCSPResponse for malformed response test cases).

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jnimeh/reviews/8074064/webrev.03/index.html

Thanks, Vinnie for the feedback and suggestions!
--Jamil

On 03/03/2015 04:10 PM, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
> Okay, I've got an updated webrev for this issue:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jnimeh/reviews/8074064/webrev.02/index.html
>
> Thanks,
> --Jamil
>
> On 03/03/2015 02:18 PM, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
>> Hello all, I've come across a couple edge cases that this fix doesn't 
>> cover properly.  I'll put out another webrev in a bit that should 
>> tighten up the singleResponse parsing, particularly with the optional 
>> fields. It will also include a couple other negative test input samples.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --Jamil
>>
>> On 03/02/2015 04:05 PM, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
>>> Hello all, this review fixes an issue in OCSPResponse where it does 
>>> not parse singleExtensions in the SingleResponse structure.  I also 
>>> fixed two minor deviations from the OCSP.RevocationStatus interface 
>>> when getRevocationTime and getRevocationReason are called on good 
>>> responses.
>>>
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074064
>>> Review: 
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jnimeh/reviews/8074064/webrev.01/index.html
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> --Jamil
>>
>