RFR 8152205: jdk.security.provider.preferred is ambiguously documented

[Wang Weijun]

In my DRBG changeset, I use this style:

{@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} {@linkplain Security#getProperty(String) security property}

--Max



> On Apr 7, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Bradford Wetmore <bradford.wetmore at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> If I was doing this from scratch, I would probably capitalize it to indicate it's a java.security.Security property and add inside the @code.
> 
> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} security
> ->
> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred Security}
> 
> But I see it done that way in other places, so this is fine.
> 
> Brad
> 
> 
> 
> On 4/6/2016 3:47 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>> Looks fine to me.
>> 
>> Xuelei
>> 
>> On 4/7/2016 5:23 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
>>> I need a review of this very simple doc clarification.  Calling out
>>> jdk.security.provider.preferred as a "security property" instead of just
>>> a "property".
>>> 
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8152205/webrev/
>>> 
>>> thanks.
>>> 
>>> Tony
>>