RFR 8152205: jdk.security.provider.preferred is ambiguously documented

[Anthony Scarpino]

Thanks

Tony

On 04/12/2016 05:36 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
> Looks fine to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Xuelei
>
> On 4/11/2016 11:59 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
>> Ok.. I changed it to:
>> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} {@link
>> Security#getProperty(String) Security}
>>
>> I updated it at the same link if someone wants to double check my work
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8152205/webrev/
>>
>> Tony
>>
>> On 04/07/2016 11:42 AM, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
>>> On 4/6/2016 6:40 PM, Wang Weijun wrote:
>>>> In my DRBG changeset, I use this style:
>>>>
>>>> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} {@linkplain
>>>> Security#getProperty(String) security property}
>>>
>>> I like this or
>>>
>>> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} {@link
>>> Security#getProperty(String) Security)
>>>
>>> Brad
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 7, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Bradford Wetmore
>>>>> <bradford.wetmore at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> If I was doing this from scratch, I would probably capitalize it to
>>>>> indicate it's a java.security.Security property and add inside the
>>>>> @code.
>>>>>
>>>>> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} security
>>>>> ->
>>>>> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred Security}
>>>>>
>>>>> But I see it done that way in other places, so this is fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> Brad
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/6/2016 3:47 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>>>>>> Looks fine to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Xuelei
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/7/2016 5:23 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
>>>>>>> I need a review of this very simple doc clarification.  Calling out
>>>>>>> jdk.security.provider.preferred as a "security property" instead of
>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>> a "property".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8152205/webrev/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tony
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>