[9] RFR 8170282: Enable ALPN parameters to be supplied during the TLS handshake

Vincent Ryan vincent.x.ryan at oracle.com
Fri Dec 16 00:39:23 UTC 2016


Thanks Brad for those review comments.

I’ve make some implementation changes and updated the existing ALPN tests.
No public API changes.

A new webrev is available at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vinnie/8170282/webrev.02/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vinnie/8170282/webrev.02/>



> On 9 Dec 2016, at 23:27, Bradford Wetmore <bradford.wetmore at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> API looks good.
> 
> SSLEngineImpl/SSLSocketImpl.java
> ================================
> 212/229:  I might suggest a more descriptive variable name, like applicationSelector.  "selector" is a bit ambiguous.
> 
> 450/1379:
> getHandshakeApplicationProtocolSelector());
> ->
> selector);
> 
> Xuelei wrote:
> 
> > This method would work in server side only.  You mention this point
> > in the apiNote part.  I'd like to spec this point in the beginning
> > part.
> 
> If you do something like this, then you need to be careful to mention something like "application protocols such as ALPN would do this on the server side..."  NPN is the reverse, where the server offers the strings, and the client selects.
> 
> > and application developer know what kind of information can be
> > retrieved from the handshake session reliably.
> 
> Whatever you put in here, make sure it can be changed later in case we are able revisit the selection mechanism.
> 
> > The current application protocol selection scenarios looks like:
> 
> In my previous response, I suggested a different approach where everything ALPN is done together.  I think it may be similar to your N1-4.
> 
> I look forward to the ServerHandshaker change next week.
> 
> Brad
> 
> 
> On 12/9/2016 1:08 PM, Vincent Ryan wrote:
>> Thanks for your detailed review Brad. I’ve generated a new webrev:
>>    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vinnie/8170282/webrev.01/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 9 Dec 2016, at 01:34, Bradford Wetmore <Bradford.Wetmore at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi Vinnie,
>>> 
>>> On 12/8/2016 2:18 PM, Vincent Ryan wrote:
>>>> The Java Servlet Expect Group reported that they have identified a specific HTTP2 server use-case that cannot
>>>> be easily addressed using the existing ALPN APIs.
>>>> 
>>>> This changeset fixes that problem. It supports a new callback mechanism to allow TLS server applications
>>>> to set an application protocol during the TLS handshake. Specifically it allows the cipher suite chosen by the
>>>> TLS protocol implementation to be examined by the TLS server application before it sets the application protocol.
>>>> Additional TLS parameters are also available for inspection in the callback function.
>>>> 
>>>> This new mechanism is available only to TLS server applications. TLS clients will continue to use the existing ALPN APIs.
>>> 
>>> Technically, the API could be used for NPN (though it's pretty much dead), so that would be a listing the options on the server side, and selection on client side.
>>> 
>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170282
>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vinnie/8170282/webrev.00/
>>> 
>>> SSLEngineImpl.java/SSLSocketImpl.java
>>> =====================================
>>> Please use the standard handshaker initialization pattern where the Handshaker is initialized with all of the data/mechanisms needed for a complete handshake.  This will will ensure consistent handshake results and avoid potential strange race conditions.  (There's some corresponding API comments below.)
>>> 
>>> You would register your callback after the handshaker.setApplicationProtocols() calls at (currently) line 444 in the SSLEngineImpl code.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> SSLEngine.java/SSLSocket.java
>>> =============================
>>> I would suggest putting an introduction to this addition in the class description section, that application values can be set using SSLParameters.setApplication...() and selected with the default algorithm, or that a more accurate selection mechanism can be created by registering the callback that could look at any Handshake in progress and make appropriate decisions.
>>> 
>>> 1339:
>>> Registers the callback function that selects an application protocol
>>> value during the SSL/TLS/DTLS handshake.
>>> ->
>>> Registers a callback function that selects an application protocol
>>> value for a SSL/TLS/DTLS handshake.  The function overrides any values set using {@link SSLParameters#setApplicationProtocols SSLParameters.setApplicationProtocols}.
>>> 
>>> and remove the corresponding section from the return docs (in the {@code String section}).
>>> 
>>> the function's first argument enables the current
>>> handshake settings to be inspected.<br>
>>> ->
>>> the function's first argument allows the current SSLEngine(SSLSocket) to be inspected, including the handshake session and configuration settings.<br>
>>> 
>>> If null is returned, or a value that was not advertised
>>> then the underlying protocol will determine what action
>>> to take.
>>> (For example, ALPN will send a "no_application_protocol"
>>> alert and terminate the connection.)
>>> ->
>>> If the return value is null (no value chosen) or is a value that was not advertised by the peer, the underlying protocol will determine what action to take.  (For example, ALPN will send a "no_application_protocol" alert and terminate the connection.)
>>> 
>>> Also, TLS should be configured with parameters that
>>> ->
>>> Also, this SSLEngine(SSLSocket) should be configured with parameters that
>>> 
>>> @param selector the callback function, or null to de-register.
>>> ->
>>> @param selector the callback function, or null to disable the callback functionality.
>>> 
>>> Retrieves the callback function that selects an application protocol
>>> value during the SSL/TLS/DTLS handshake.
>>> ->
>>> Retrieves the callback function that selects an application protocol
>>> value during a SSL/TLS/DTLS handshake.
>>> 
>>>   This method should be called by TLS protocol implementations during
>>>   the TLS handshake. The callback function should not be called until
>>>   after the cipher suite has been selected.
>>> 
>>> I would suggest removing this apiNote entirely.  I expect only applications will call this method, so the first sentence is not necessary since it's up to the implementation how it wants to store the BiFunction.  I expect that when the handshaker is initialized, the current BiFunction will be assigned to it, and thus can't be changed for the current handshake/Handshaker in progress.  The second sentence ties an ordering to the selection of ciphersuite and ALPN value, and will tie our hands if we ever revisit the group protocol/ciphersuite/SNI/ALPN selection discussion.
>>> 
>>> ServerHandshaker.java
>>> =====================
>>> I was expecting that the ALPN callback logic would be an update for our current ALPN decision logic.  If a callback was set, use it, else look at defined strings from the SSLParameters, else fail.  e.g.
>>> 
>>>   ALPNExtension clientHelloALPN = (ALPNExtension)
>>>       mesg.extensions.get(ExtensionType.EXT_ALPN);
>>> 
>>>   if (clientHelloALPN != null) {
>>>       List<String> protocols = clientHelloALPN.getPeerAPs();
>>>       if (applicationSelector != null) {
>>>           applicationProtocol =
>>>               selector.apply(SSLEngine/SSLSocket, peerAPs);
>>>       } else if (localApl.length > 0)) {
>>>           // Intersect the requested and the locally supported,
>>>           // and save for later.  Use server preference order
>>>           for (String ap : localApl) {
>>>               ...deleted...
>>>           }
>>>           applicationProtocol = negotiatedValue;
>>>       }
>>>       if (negotiatedValue == null) {
>>>           fatalSE(Alerts.alert_no_application_protocol,
>>>               new SSLHandshakeException(
>>>                   "No matching ALPN values"));
>>>       }
>>>   }
>>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> 
>>> Brad
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20161216/0f04b828/attachment.htm>


More information about the security-dev mailing list