Code Review Request JDK-8146387, Test SSLSession/SessionCacheSizeTests socket accept timed out

Xuelei Fan xuelei.fan at oracle.com
Mon Jan 11 11:02:36 UTC 2016


On 1/11/2016 5:43 PM, Wang Weijun wrote:
> 
>>>
>>>> You want to start a server on the same port on and on?
>>>>
>>> Not actually.  Different port are used for different server socket.  The
>>> logic looks like:
>>>   // define four slots for the ports
>>>   int serverPorts[] = new int[]{0, 0, 0, 0};
>>>
>>>   // for each slot, create a server socket,
>>>   // and assign the actually used port for each slot.
>>>   for each slots run a thread {
>>>      SSLServerSocket sslServerSocket = ...
>>>      serverPorts[nextPort] = sslServerSocket.getLocalPort();
>>>                  ^^^^^^^^
>>>   }
>>>
>>>   // use the actual port for each slot in client side
>>>   if (server ready) {
>>>      connect to the server socket (host:port)
>>>   }
> 
> Why do you need a serverPort parameter in doServerSide()? Can it just always be 0?
> 
It is always 0 before the server socket generated.  But after the server
socket generated,  need to remember the actual port so that client can
connect to the port.

>>>
>>> This fix is trying to increase the createdPorts value properly.  It is
>>> not actually need to synchronize serverPorts.
> 
> I see. Why not just synchronized on this and add a small comment?
> 
Synchronized on any object is OK.  I will add a comment like:
    // set the server port and increase the count synchronized

Thanks,
Xuelei



More information about the security-dev mailing list