RFR(M): 8170525: Fix minor issues in awt coding
Vincent Ryan
vincent.x.ryan at oracle.com
Wed Nov 30 16:09:56 UTC 2016
Note that I have reviewed only the ECC/PKCS11 changes.
You’ll need a JDK 9 reviewer from awt-dev for your remaining changes.
There is a minor typo in the commit message: s/ece/ECC
Also please change the Bug Summary in JBS to indicate that ECC and PKCS11 changes are also present.
> On 30 Nov 2016, at 15:41, Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> thanks for the quit review!
> Good catch that I lost the change to p11_mutex.c ... I had to change
> it and it fell out of my patches.
That looks fine.
> I edited the Last Modified Date, and also updated the copyright messages.
Thanks.
> New webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8170525-awt-dev/
>
> Best regards,
> Goetz.
>
> (Am I correct that your openJdk name is Vinnie?)
Yes.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vincent Ryan [mailto:vincent.x.ryan at oracle.com]
>> Sent: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 14:53
>> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>
>> Cc: awt-dev at openjdk.java.net; security-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: Re: RFR(M): 8170525: Fix minor issues in awt coding
>>
>> Hello Goetz,
>>
>> Please modify the bug summary to reference ECC too.
>> Your ECC changes look fine but the ‘Last Modified Date’ line in the 4 source
>> code headers will need to be updated/added.
>>
>> BTW p11_mutex.c is listed below but appears to be missing from the webrev.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 30 Nov 2016, at 13:12, Lindenmaier, Goetz
>> <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com <mailto:goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com> > wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’d like to propose a row of smaller fixes where code is noted down a
>> bit questionable.
>> SAP’s quality process requires that we fix these in our internal delivery,
>> and I
>> Would like to share my fixes with openJdk. Some of these fixes are of
>> more
>> theoretical nature as how I understand the code paths never allow the
>> problematic situation, but fixing it nevertheless assures that nothing is
>> overseen if the code changes. Most changes are in libawt_xawt, some
>> are in libsunec.
>>
>> I’d appreciate a review:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8170525-awt/webrev.01/
>>
>> Changes in detail:
>>
>> awt_InputMethod.c:
>>
>> One might overrun the 100 byte fixed-size string statusWindow->status
>> by copying text->string.multi_byte without checking the length.
>>
>> gtk3_interface.c:
>>
>> This less-than-zero comparison of an unsigned value is never true.
>>
>> Using uninitialized value color. Field color.alpha is uninitialized.
>> E.g. used at gtk3_interface.c:2287.
>>
>> XToolkit.c
>>
>> Using uninitialized value ret_timeout.
>> E.g. in XToolkit.c:6809.
>>
>> XWindow.c
>>
>> Argument is incompatible with corresponding format string conversion.
>>
>> splashscreen_sys.c
>>
>> Overflowed or truncated value (or a value computed from an
>> overflowed or truncated value) (gdk_scale > 0) ? native_scale *
>> (double)gdk_scale : native_scale used as return value.
>>
>> ec.c
>>
>> Using uninitialized value k.dp when calling mp_clear.
>>
>> ecdecode.c
>>
>> You might overrun the 291 byte fixed-size string genenc by copying
>> curveParams->geny without checking the length.
>> Added sanity check before doing the string concatenation.
>>
>> ecl_mult.c
>>
>> Using uninitialized value kt.flag when calling *group->point_mul. (The
>> function pointer resolves to ec_GF2m_pt_mul_mont.)
>>
>> mpi.c
>>
>> Using uninitialized value s. Field s.flag is uninitialized when calling
>> s_mp_exch.
>> Using uninitialized value tmp. Field tmp.flag is uninitialized when
>> calling s_mp_exch
>> Using uninitialized value t.dp when calling mp_clear.
>>
>> p11_mutex.c
>>
>> Using uninitialized value *ckpInitArgs. Field ckpInitArgs->flags is
>> uninitialized when calling memcpy.
>>
>>
>> DataBufferNative.c
>>
>> Using uninitialized value lockInfo.rasBase when calling
>> BN_GetPixelPointer.
>>
>> fontpath.c
>>
>> You might overrun the 512 byte fixed-size string fontDirPath by copying
>> DirP->name[index] without checking the length.
>>
>
More information about the security-dev
mailing list