RFR: 8173581 : performance regression in com/sun/crypto/provider/OutputFeedback.java

Chuck Rasbold rasbold at google.com
Mon Jan 30 22:13:32 UTC 2017


Thanks, Sean. Waiting for Valerie sounds good to me.

It has been quite some time since I've had the joy of directly pushing my
own fix.
I can do it myself, or hand it over to the Security team - whatever you
prefer.

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Sean Mullan <sean.mullan at oracle.com>
wrote:

> The fix looks ok to me, but I would also like Valerie to review it since
> she is more familiar with this code.
>
> As far as JDK 9 goes, we are in Rampdown Phase 1. According to the rules
> [1], since it is a P3 and is new in JDK 9 we should try to fix this issue
> if we can.
>
> Were you offering to push this fix or did you want someone in the Security
> group to take this over from you?
>
> --Sean
>
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/rdp-1
>
>
> On 1/30/17 2:24 PM, Chuck Rasbold wrote:
>
>> Here's a tiny fix for an unintended, but clear, performance regression.
>>
>> I'm not familiar of the current criteria for jdk9 changes. Please advise
>> this mostly HotSpot engineer if / how to move forward.
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rasbold/8173581/webrev.00/
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rasbold/8173581/webrev.00/>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20170130/70f4f5dc/attachment.html>


More information about the security-dev mailing list