RFR: 8173581 : performance regression in com/sun/crypto/provider/OutputFeedback.java

Chuck Rasbold rasbold at google.com
Tue Jan 31 00:41:23 UTC 2017


Thank you!

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Valerie Peng <valerie.peng at oracle.com>
wrote:

>
> I can push the fix for you after looking it over and running it through
> the regular testing process.
> Thanks,
> Valerie
>
>
> On 1/30/2017 2:13 PM, Chuck Rasbold wrote:
>
> Thanks, Sean. Waiting for Valerie sounds good to me.
>
> It has been quite some time since I've had the joy of directly pushing my
> own fix.
> I can do it myself, or hand it over to the Security team - whatever you
> prefer.
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Sean Mullan <sean.mullan at oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The fix looks ok to me, but I would also like Valerie to review it since
>> she is more familiar with this code.
>>
>> As far as JDK 9 goes, we are in Rampdown Phase 1. According to the rules
>> [1], since it is a P3 and is new in JDK 9 we should try to fix this issue
>> if we can.
>>
>> Were you offering to push this fix or did you want someone in the
>> Security group to take this over from you?
>>
>> --Sean
>>
>> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/rdp-1
>>
>>
>> On 1/30/17 2:24 PM, Chuck Rasbold wrote:
>>
>>> Here's a tiny fix for an unintended, but clear, performance regression.
>>>
>>> I'm not familiar of the current criteria for jdk9 changes. Please advise
>>> this mostly HotSpot engineer if / how to move forward.
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rasbold/8173581/webrev.00/
>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rasbold/8173581/webrev.00/>
>>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20170130/09c050d7/attachment.html>


More information about the security-dev mailing list