JDK-8016345 (DNSName does not accept names with leading numbers) will-not-fix? Why?

[Sean Mullan]

On 3/27/17 10:56 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> thank you!
>
> Is it planned to fix 8054380? I see it is still open, but the assignee
> (Jason Uh) is marked as inactive and the issue is dormant since creation.

Not for JDK 9 since it is not critical. Note that this is only an issue 
when creating certificates with keytool and not when validating 
certificates. You could try using another tool to create certificates.

--Sean

>
> ..Thomas
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Sean Mullan <sean.mullan at oracle.com
> <mailto:sean.mullan at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>     Good catch, I actually closed it as a duplicate but marked it as a
>     duplicate of the wrong bug, it should have been
>     https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8054380
>     <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8054380>
>
>     I fixed it so 8054380 is now the duplicate.
>
>     --Sean
>
>
>     On 3/27/17 9:26 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>
>         Hi all,
>
>         just a question, I hope this is the correct mailing list.
>
>         There is https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016345
>         <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016345>, which is
>         about DNSName not accepting host names with leading numbers,
>         which is
>         valid according to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1123
>         <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_rfc1123&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=wLZjDoZBdVMUe0-SnmtSgQUVl_gHmb_3aP58rurBKYA&m=DIIlALFx4DAHzx8FoLMhTQreVvtYOfMOHKfC_BltFn0&s=P6InJ7Ev_MpscdwaQI48sF2uMdTwbt124szmBQY03zE&e=>
>         (Section 2.1).
>
>         This bug was marked as a duplicate
>         of https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8007706
>         <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8007706>, which I do not
>         understand - what do these errors have in common?
>
>         I try to understand why JDK-8016345 was marked as will-not-fix. Are
>         there any reasons to not fix the parser in DNSName.java (because
>         the fix
>         itself looks trivial)?
>
>         Thank you, and Kind Regards, Thomas
>
>