RFR[11] JDK-8146293 "Add Support for RSA-PSS Signature Algorithm as in PKCS#1 v2.2"

[Sean Mullan]

On 4/30/18 3:27 PM, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
> Xuelei/Tony changed my mind.  I'm now more preferring #2, since it's in 
> a 3rd party already.  I'd still be happy with #1.
> 
> Brad
> 
> 
> On 4/30/2018 11:40 AM, Valerie Peng wrote:
>>
>> I reordered the names and missed to update some of the description.
>>
>> #2 and #3 are from 3rd party providers. #1 is what I have in the 
>> webrev, #4 is just a new alternative in case people may prefer it over 
>> #1.
>>
>> Can you all please re-confirm your preference is?

I also now think #2 is more appropriate than #1 even though it is 
longer. My change of mind is based on the RFCs using that name.

--Sean

>> Thanks!
>> Valerie
>>
>> On 4/27/2018 4:51 PM, Sean Mullan wrote:
>>> My vote is #1.
>>>
>>> --Sean
>>>
>>> On 4/27/18 7:41 PM, Valerie Peng wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'd also strongly prefer to pick one as standard name for RSA PSS 
>>>> signature and use it consistently.
>>>>
>>>> Here are the possible choices for RSA PSS standard names:
>>>>
>>>>  1. RSA-PSS
>>>>  2. RSASSA-PSS
>>>>  3. RSA/PSS
>>>>  4. RSAPSS