Inconsistent SSLEngine behavior for closing outbound while in handshake in 11ea22
Bradford Wetmore
bradford.wetmore at oracle.com
Mon Aug 13 21:12:47 UTC 2018
An update.
1. OK vs. BUFFER_UNDERFLOW may still be an issue. It's not a big one,
but potentially confusing as to when you will get either.
2. I thought I saw this in the non-TLSv1.3 contexts also, but I think I
must have been reverted my test case back to "TLS", which uses the
TLS1.3 1/2 close. I can't get it to duplicate in TLSv1.2/1.1/1 today.
Never mind.
Brad
On 8/10/2018 6:14 PM, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
>
>
> On 8/9/2018 5:57 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>> Thank you, Tim! Please feel free to submit bugs and comments.
>
> I went through a standard SSLEngineTemplate handshake/data/close with a
> fine-tooth comb (debugger), and found two bugs based on your -04 patch.
>
> 1. Things may have changed since the original SSLEngine implementation,
> but unwrap() was supposed to return a BUFFER_UNDERFLOW if there is not
> enough (or any) inbound data to make a packet. I'm seeing a mix of OK
> and BUFFER_UNDERFLOW. I haven't determined the pattern, but you should
> be able to run my test (attached) and see pretty quickly.
>
> 2. I haven't not had the cycles to follow the earlier discussion, so
> this may be a duplicate of something already discussed, but I got myself
> into an endless loop because the closes weren't happening as expected.
>
> In the attached file, after the handshaking and data exchange, close
> just one of the SSLEngines outbound side. I'll use client for this
> example, but same error with server side:
>
> // clientEngine.closeOutbound();
> clientEngine.getHandshakeStatus() == NEED_WRAP
> client.isInboundDone(): false
> client.isOutboundDone(): false
>
> // client.wrap() sends the Close Notify (CN).
> client wrap: CLOSED/NEED_UNWRAP, 0/24 bytes
> clientEngine.getHandshakeStatus() == NEED_UNWRAP
> client.isInboundDone(): false
> client.isOutboundDone(): true
>
> // server.unwrap() parses the CN, and closes the inbound side.
> server unwrap: CLOSED/NEED_WRAP, 24/0 bytes
> clientEngine.getHandshakeStatus() == NEED_WRAP
> server.isInboundDone(): true
> server.isOutboundDone(): false
>
> So far so good.
>
> // server.wrap() needs to send the corresponding close_notify.
> server wrap: OK/NEED_WRAP, 0/0 bytes
> clientEngine.getHandshakeStatus() == NEED_WRAP
> server.isInboundDone(): true
> server.isOutboundDone(): false
>
> Whoops, it didn't happen. No outbound data was generated. State is
> still in NEED_WRAP. I just let the app run, it never closes because no
> CN is generated on the server side.
>
> Run the attached file for full details.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brad
>
>> Xuelei
>>
>> On 8/9/2018 4:23 PM, Tim Brooks wrote:
>>> Hi Xuelei,
>>>
>>> My test passed using that patch. I’ll continue to explore over the
>>> next few days. But that patch resolves the main issues that I had
>>> encountered.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> - Tim
>>>
>>>> On Aug 7, 2018, at 8:54 AM, Xuelei Fan <xuelei.fan at oracle.com
>>>> <mailto:xuelei.fan at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Xuelei
>>>
More information about the security-dev
mailing list