Code Review Request: TLS 1.3 Implementation
Xuelei Fan
xuelei.fan at oracle.com
Sat Jun 2 14:51:49 UTC 2018
Update for the following comment:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/sandbox/rev/e5ed96e446ad
This update will be included in the next webrev for further review.
Xuelei
On 6/1/2018 8:59 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8196584/webrev-full.00
>
> KeyShareExtension.java
> ----------------------
> 346 NamedGroup ng = NamedGroup.valueOf(entry.namedGroupId);
> -347 if (ng != null && !SupportedGroups.isActivatable(
> +347 if (ng == null || !SupportedGroups.isActivatable(
> 348 shc.sslConfig.algorithmConstraints, ng)) {
> ...
> 354 continue;
> 355 }
>
> 'ng' could be null. Looks like, a "null" ng should be ignored as well.
>
>
> Xuelei
>
> On 5/25/2018 4:45 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to invite you to review the TLS 1.3 implementation. I
>> appreciate it if I could have compatibility and specification feedback
>> before May 31, 2018, and implementation feedback before June 7, 2018.
>>
>> Here is the webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8196584/webrev-full.00
>>
>> The formal TLS 1.3 specification is not finalized yet, although it had
>> been approved to be a standard. The implementation is based on the
>> draft version 28:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-tls13-28
>>
>> For the overall description of this enhancement, please refer to JEP 332:
>> http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/332
>>
>> For the compatibility and specification update, please refer to CSR
>> 8202625:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202625
>>
>> Note that we are using the sandbox for the development right now. For
>> more information, please refer to Bradford's previous email:
>>
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2018-May/017139.html
>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Xuelei
More information about the security-dev
mailing list