RFR: JDK-8221990: JDK11 Backport for "Program fails when using JDK addressed by UNC path and using Security Manager"
Sean Mullan
sean.mullan at oracle.com
Fri Apr 5 14:19:57 UTC 2019
On 4/5/19 9:56 AM, Adam Farley8 wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> Sean Mullan <sean.mullan at oracle.com> wrote on 05/04/2019 14:48:14:
>
>> From: Sean Mullan <sean.mullan at oracle.com>
>> To: Adam Farley8 <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com>, security-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Date: 05/04/2019 14:47
>> Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8221990: JDK11 Backport for "Program fails
>> when using JDK addressed by UNC path and using Security Manager"
>>
>> On 4/4/19 12:03 PM, Adam Farley8 wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > It's been pointed out that the issue in 8218618 affects JDK11 as well.
>> >
>> > Is there any concern over backporting the fix?
>>
>> No, if it is a straight backport and you haven't changed the fix, it
>> should be safe.
>>
>> --Sean
>
> It is a straight backport of the change, however the file the change
> is being applied to differs slightly between 11 and 12.
>
> Not in a way that seems to affect us today, but still worth mentioning.
>
> Would you mind sponsoring this change?
I am not actively working on OpenJDK11u right now. Is there another
Committer from IBM or maybe RedHat that can sponsor this for you?
Thanks,
Sean
>
> Best Regards
>
> Adam Farley
> IBM Runtimes
>
>>
>> >
>> > Reviews and thoughts are appreciated.
>> >
>> > Bug: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
>> u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D8221990&d=DwIC-
>> g&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=P5m8KWUXJf-
>> CeVJc0hDGD9AQ2LkcXDC0PMV9ntVw5Ho&m=1Bn_F993CxYkTmg_LTUMVQMWbcQpksz5QHcK6LWGDKQ&s=2_MaBtbGJHgTTf6Ctq_PXYtO6WIihcWl2Mcto9npoMU&e=
>> >
>> > Webrev: _https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
>> u=http-3A__cr.openjdk.java.net_-7Eafarley_8221990_webrev_-5F&d=DwIC-
>> g&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=P5m8KWUXJf-
>> CeVJc0hDGD9AQ2LkcXDC0PMV9ntVw5Ho&m=1Bn_F993CxYkTmg_LTUMVQMWbcQpksz5QHcK6LWGDKQ&s=aFGLrsdqioi9MOwsHNF7HEDi0Mn0pn59LmwJE3WZWDs&e=
>> >
>> > Note: The jtreg tests for PolicyFile have been executed, and the
>> > pass/fail rate is the same before and after the fix.
>> >
>> > Best Regards
>> >
>> > Adam Farley
>> > IBM Runtimes
>> >
>> > Unless stated otherwise above:
>> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
>> > 741598.
>> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
More information about the security-dev
mailing list