Is TLS1.3 support missing the "certificate_authorities" extension?
Andrew Leonard
andrew_m_leonard at uk.ibm.com
Tue Jan 15 09:03:22 UTC 2019
Re-posting this question..
Isn't the "certificate_authorities" extension mandatory for TLS1.3?
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8206925
See https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-tls13-20#section-4.2.4
There's a known typo in
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-tls13-20#section-4.4.2.2
which from this comment:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg23612.html
indicates section 4.4.2.2 was a typo and "certificate_authorities" should
be used instead of "trusted_ca_keys"
Should JDK-8206925 be a "bug"? Thoughts?
Many thanks
Andrew
Andrew Leonard
Java Runtimes Development
IBM Hursley
IBM United Kingdom Ltd
Phone internal: 245913, external: 01962 815913
internet email: andrew_m_leonard at uk.ibm.com
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20190115/6d543c6e/attachment.htm>
More information about the security-dev
mailing list