RFR: CSR for 8211018 Session Resumption without Server-Side State

[Sean Mullan]

On 5/23/19 2:45 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
>> For previous system properties that enable extensions, we have used a 
>> boolean property with the naming convention 
>> "jdk.tls.client.enable<ExtensionName" (for example 
>> "jdk.tls.client.enableStatusRequestExtension", so we should probably 
>> stick to that convention and call it 
>> "jdk.tls.client.enableSessionTicketExtension" (with value true/false).
> 
> In those other cases with "enable<ExtName>" are they never on by 
> default.  I don't have a problem with renaming it for consistency.  But, 
> when the property is enabled by default, it seems a bit funny 
> wording-wise to have to use "j.t.c.enableSessionTicketExtension=false"

Maybe, I guess you are saying that at some point, we might flip the 
default to being on. But if that were the case, I think it would be rare 
for someone to turn it off (probably mostly for debugging) and (to me 
anyway) the usage above doesn't seem so weird.

--Sean