Is there any reason not to have 8223269 in JDK baseline?

[Seán Coffey]

Martin,

Newer JDK families should be using the PKCS12 keystore format. For that 
reason, I kept it 8u only. It was a solution to address a particular use 
case reported by an Oracle JDK user.

regards,
Sean.

On 30/10/2019 18:21, Martin Balao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed that 8223269 [1] (not public) has been included in Oracle's
> 8u231 JDK [2].
>
> Is there a reason not to have this in JDK baseline? (and, thus, create a
> backport for the open JDKs)
>
> In case there is not, I'll proceed with a new ticket (unless you want to
> make [1] public), a CSR and a patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Martin.-
>
> --
> [1] - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223269
> [2] -
> https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/8u231-relnotes-5592812.html#JDK-8223269
>