RFR 8242260: Remove customizable ContentSigner from jarsigner

[Peter Levart]

What's the use of allowing compiling some classes if those classes can't 
be used anywhere? They would be unusable in the new release of 
jarsigner. Ok, they could be used in some older jarsigner if the classes 
were compiled with appropriate -release option. So the usecase for not 
removing the classes would be in a project that builds an implementation 
of ContentSigner and then publishes it to be used in a project that 
still uses an old jarsigner. Such ContentSigner project could then be 
upgraded to use the new JDK/javac with appropriate -release option for 
compiling ContentSigner implementation classes.

Peter

On 4/10/20 3:58 AM, Wang Weijun wrote:
> So the classes will be useless but at least old program still compiles. I'll modify the CSR and see how Joe thinks of this.
>
> Thanks,
> Max
>
>> 在 2020年4月9日，22:58，Sean Mullan <sean.mullan at oracle.com> 写道：
>>
>> On 4/9/20 10:52 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
>>> All info for signing are passed into a ContentSigner through a ContentSignerParameters object. In order to pass more info, I’ll need to create new interface methods for it.
>> But you can just use your solution in JarSigner in the webrev below where you are calling PKCS7.generateSignedData instead of ContentSigner. Just because the ContentSigner APIs are still there doesn't mean you have to use it in jarsigner (unless I am missing something).
>>
>> --Sean
>>
>>> —Max
>>>>> 在 2020年4月9日，21:27，Sean Mullan <sean.mullan at oracle.com> 写道：
>>>> On 4/9/20 3:13 AM, Wang Weijun wrote:
>>>>> Oh, I'll then need to add new fields to it to support RSASSA-PSS and EdDSA. Sigh.
>>>> Why would you need to do that if they are deprecated?
>>>>
>>>> --Sean
>>>>
>>>>> --Max
>>>>>>> 在 2020年4月9日，01:58，Sean Mullan <sean.mullan at oracle.com> 写道：
>>>>>> We never actually deprecated the com.sun.jarsigner package with a forRemoval=true flag, so while it may be very low-risk to remove these APIs, I feel that we should not remove it w/o prior notice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would suggest adding the forRemoval=true for this package/APIs instead, and plan on removing it in JDK 16 or 17.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm ok with removing the jarsigner options because the man page already warned that they may be removed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Sean
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/7/20 4:04 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
>>>>>>> I am thinking about removing the `jarsigner -altsigner -altsignerpath` options and underlying classes:
>>>>>>>              JBS : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8242260
>>>>>>> Please review everything at:
>>>>>>>     Release note : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8242261
>>>>>>>              CSR : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8242262
>>>>>>>           webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8242260/webrev.00/
>>>>>>> The CSR "Problem" section has more info on why it's better to remove it now.
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Max