RFR JDK-8239950: Update PKCS9 Attributes to PKCS#9 v2.0 Encodings

[Weijun Wang]

Perfect, thank you for encoding exact 16 bytes on each line and have them aligned.

Thanks,
Max

> On Jun 23, 2020, at 7:39 AM, Jamil Nimeh <jamil.j.nimeh at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Weijun,
> 
> I've got a new webrev with the test vectors as hexdumps of the DER encoding.  Let me know what you think.
> 
> https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jnimeh/reviews/8239950/webrev.02
> 
> --Jamil
> 
> On 6/22/20 7:56 AM, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
>> Sure, I have code in other tests to do the conversions into hexdumps as well.  I'll convert those today and send a new review out.  Thanks for looking this over, Max!
>> 
>> --Jamil
>> 
>> On 6/22/2020 12:42 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
>>> Source change looks fine to me.
>>> 
>>> One small suggestion: Is it possible to encode the bytes in the test as HEX instead of BASE64? If so, I can use my human eyes to look at the content. HexPrinter in test/lib can be used to generate them and Utils.toByteArray can be used to translate them back to byte[].
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Max
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Jun 22, 2020, at 12:07 PM, Jamil Nimeh <jamil.j.nimeh at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Ping...
>>>> 
>>>> --Jamil
>>>> 
>>>> On 6/4/20 10:55 PM, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> This brings a few PKCS#9 attributes (unstructuredName, unstructuredAddress, signingTime) into line with v2.0 of the spec (RFC 2985).  It mostly expands the allowed string or date types for these attributes.  I also came across a corner-case bug where toString calls on PKCS9Attribute objects were throwing NPE if the attribute type was a UniversalString, so that is addressed in this webrev too.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Webrev: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jnimeh/reviews/8239950/webrev.01
>>>>> 
>>>>> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8239950
>>>>> 
>>>>> --Jamil
>>>>>