RFR: 8244224: Implementation of JEP 381: Remove the Solaris and SPARC Ports (security)
Mikael Vidstedt
mikael.vidstedt at oracle.com
Tue May 5 23:17:34 UTC 2020
John,
Thanks for the review! Comments/questions inline..
> On May 4, 2020, at 4:02 PM, sha.jiang at oracle.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Generally, this patch doesn't take care of the solaris/sunos/ucrypto-related
> words in test summaries, code comments, configs and READMEs.
> E.g.
> test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/templates/SSLEngineTemplate.java
> test/jdk/sun/security/provider/MessageDigest/TestSHAClone.java
> test/jdk/sun/security/util/Resources/Format.config
> test/jdk/sun/security/pkcs11/KeyStore/BasicData/README
> Would we need some follow-up issues to double-check this point?
I’ve deliberately avoided changing comments I didn’t feel comfortable modifying. I’d prefer to file follow-ups as needed, but if you have specific suggestions (or patches!) I should include in the already huge patch do let me know.
> test/jdk/sun/security/tools/keytool/KeyToolTest.java
> 39 * Testing Solaris Cryptography Framework PKCS11 keystores:
> 40 * # make sure you've already run pktool and set test12 as pin
> 41 * echo | java -Dsolaris KeyToolTest
> ...
> 1863 if (System.getProperty("solaris") != null) {
> 1864 // For Solaris Cryptography Framework
> 1865 t.srcP11Arg = SUN_SRC_P11_ARG;
> 1866 t.p11Arg = SUN_P11_ARG;
> 1867 t.testPKCS11();
> 1868 t.testPKCS11ImportKeyStore();
> 1869 t.i18nPKCS11Test();
> 1870 }
> It may be necessary to remove the above lines.
I was staring at this one for quite a while. AFAICT there’s nothing Solaris specific about that block or the methods it’s calling - to me it looks like the property just happens to be called “solaris”, but it could equally well be called “pkcs11” or “standard” or “foobar”. That said, I don’t know enough about PKCS11 & friends to say for sure. Do let me know if it is indeed dead code and should be removed..
> test/jdk/sun/security/provider/PolicyParser/PrincipalExpansionError.java
> test/jdk/sun/security/provider/PolicyParser/PrincipalExpansionError.policy
> It looks this manual test and the associated policy are solaris-related only.
> Could these files be removed as well?
> In fact, the solaris-related com.sun.security.auth classes, including
> SolarisPrincipal, are already removed.
Ah, that indeed seems to be the case. Made me wonder why the test doesn’t fail to compile altogether, but then I noticed that it’s ProblemListed on all platforms..
How about a follow-up since this isn’t strictly related to the Solaris/SPARC removal itself - perhaps https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039280 covers it?
> test/jdk/sun/security/pkcs11/tls/TestPRF.java
> 114 if (secret == null) {
> 115 // This fails on Solaris, but since we never call this
> 116 // API for this case in JSSE, ignore the failure.
> 117 // (SunJSSE uses the CKM_TLS_KEY_AND_MAC_DERIVE
> 118 // mechanism)
> 119 System.out.print("X");
> 120 continue;
> 121 }
> Could remove this block?
Good question - the comment certainly makes it sound Solaris specific, but could be a stale comment..
Cheers,
Mikael
>
> On 2020/5/4 13:12, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
>> Please review this change which implements part of JEP 381:
>>
>> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8244224
>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mikael/webrevs/8244224/webrev.00/security/open/webrev/
>> JEP: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241787
>>
>>
>> Note: When reviewing this, please be aware that this exercise was *extremely* mind-numbing, so I appreciate your help reviewing all the individual changes carefully. You may want to get that coffee cup filled up (or whatever keeps you awake)!
>>
>>
>> Background:
>>
>> Because of the size of the total patch and wide range of areas touched, this patch is one out of in total six partial patches which together make up the necessary changes to remove the Solaris and SPARC ports. The other patches are being sent out for review to mailing lists appropriate for the respective areas the touch. An email will be sent to jdk-dev summarizing all the patches/reviews. To be clear: this patch is *not* in itself complete and stand-alone - all of the (six) patches are needed to form a complete patch. Some changes in this patch may look wrong or incomplete unless also looking at the corresponding changes in other areas.
>>
>> For convenience, I’m including a link below[1] to the full webrev, but in case you have comments on changes in other areas, outside of the files included in this thread, please provide those comments directly in the thread on the appropriate mailing list for that area if possible.
>>
>> In case it helps, the changes were effectively produced by searching for and updating any code mentioning “solaris", “sparc”, “solstudio”, “sunos”, etc. More information about the areas impacted can be found in the JEP itself.
>>
>>
>> Testing:
>>
>> A slightly earlier version of this change successfully passed tier1-8, as well as client tier1-2. Additional testing will be done after the first round of reviews has been completed.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mikael
>>
>> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mikael/webrevs/8244224/webrev.00/all/open/webrev/
More information about the security-dev
mailing list