Request for review of JDK-8251548
Сергей Цыпанов
sergei.tsypanov at yandex.ru
Thu Sep 17 09:24:39 UTC 2020
Hi David,
thanks for pointing this out!
I've created a PR there [1], but GitHub for some reason wants me to sign OCA,
which I have already signed in 2017. I've redone the procedure and now I'm waiting
for verification.
Regards,
Sergey
1. https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/218
17.09.2020, 09:22, "David Holmes" <david.holmes at oracle.com>:
> Hi Sergey,
>
> Since OpenJDK has moved to git/github, this needs to reformulated as a
> Pull Request (PR).
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
> On 17/09/2020 5:19 pm, Сергей Цыпанов wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> is it possible to have a code review for the changes proposed in JDK-8251548?
>>
>> Sean Mullan has created an issue and web-review and can sponsor the patch
>> as soos as it gets properly reviewed.
>>
>> As Doug Lea claims in http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/2015-December/014770.html
>>
>>> there is never any reason to explicitly initialize fields to 0/0.0/false/null
>>
>> so I believe the patch is harmless.
>>
>> Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8251548
>> Webrev: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mullan/webrevs/8251548/
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sergey Tsypanov
More information about the security-dev
mailing list