RFR(S): 8252407: Build failure with gcc-8+ and asan

Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Thu Sep 24 09:32:05 UTC 2020


On 24/09/2020 09:59, Kim Barrett wrote:

> If possible, my preference would be to avoid the pragma cruft and write the
> code in such a way that gcc8/9 without asan doesn't warn, and gcc10 doesn't
> warn with or without asan. I've kind of lost track in the discussion of all
> the variants whether that's actually feasible.
>
>
I agree, the program cruft in NetworkInterface.c is unmaintainable and 
not the right place for it.

-Alan.



More information about the security-dev mailing list