RFR: 8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port [v6]

Vladimir Kempik vkempik at openjdk.java.net
Tue Feb 2 11:45:04 UTC 2021


On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:06:32 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie <ihse at openjdk.org> wrote:

>>> Hello, hsdis is a separate out-of-tree project and is not part of this jep.
>> 
>> Unless there's something I'm missing it only requires a few lines of change to src/utils/hsdis/makefile (it already has support for macos x86_64)
>> 
>>>support for looking for proper hsdis dylib library was added as part of this jep.
>> 
>> I'm a little confused. Are you planning on adding a new disassembler?
>
>> > Hello, hsdis is a separate out-of-tree project and is not part of this jep.
>> 
>> Unless there's something I'm missing it only requires a few lines of change to src/utils/hsdis/makefile (it already has support for macos x86_64)
> 
> I agree with Alan that it makes sense to add this trivial change as part of this PR, if it allows the current hsdis solution to continue working on mac/aarch64.
> 
>> 
>> > support for looking for proper hsdis dylib library was added as part of this jep.
>> 
>> I'm a little confused. Are you planning on adding a new disassembler?
> 
> @a74nh I think Vladimir is referring to https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/392. The hsdis "component" has been left behind for a long time, and there are several requests to add new backends, which require a modernized build of hsdis. This is undfortunately not a high-priority project, and has been postponed several times already. :(

> > > Hello, hsdis is a separate out-of-tree project and is not part of this jep.
> > 
> > 
> > Unless there's something I'm missing it only requires a few lines of change to src/utils/hsdis/makefile (it already has support for macos x86_64)
> 
> I agree with Alan that it makes sense to add this trivial change as part of this PR, if it allows the current hsdis solution to continue working on mac/aarch64.
> 
> > > support for looking for proper hsdis dylib library was added as part of this jep.
> > 
> > 
> > I'm a little confused. Are you planning on adding a new disassembler?
> 
> @a74nh I think Vladimir is referring to #392. The hsdis "component" has been left behind for a long time, and there are several requests to add new backends, which require a modernized build of hsdis. This is undfortunately not a high-priority project, and has been postponed several times already. :(

Sorry I was under impression hsdis is not part of openjdk tree.

Alan, could you please share with us the version of binutils you were using in your test ?

Regards, Vladimir

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2200


More information about the security-dev mailing list