Performance differences between Java 8,, 11, 14 and 16

Peter Firmstone peter.firmstone at zeus.net.au
Wed May 12 06:18:03 UTC 2021


你好先生范, 不客气,

https://github.com/pfirmstone/JGDMS/blob/trunk/qa/src/org/apache/river/test/impl/mahalo/RandomStressTest.java

https://github.com/pfirmstone/JGDMS/blob/trunk/qa/src/org/apache/river/test/impl/mahalo/RandomStressTest.td

With the follow property set to reproduce:

org.apache.river.test.impl.mahalo.RandomStressTest.seed=1620791630932

谢谢

-- 
Regards,
  
Peter Firmstone
Zeus Project Services Pty Ltd.


On 12/05/2021 3:42 pm, Xuelei Fan wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> For further understanding, may I know more details about the test code?
>
> Thanks,
> Xuelei
>
>> On May 11, 2021, at 10:31 PM, Peter Firmstone <peter.firmstone at zeus.net.au> wrote:
>>
>> Just ran some performance stress tests to compare performance between Java 8 and Java 14 with SecurityManager enabled and using TLSv1.3 secure communications.
>>
>> On Java 8, AccessController.getStackAccessControlContext[native]() is 7,741ms of process CPU consumption.
>>
>> On Java 11, AccessController.getStackAccessControlContext[native]() is 7,769ms of process CPU consumption.
>>
>> On Java 14, AccessController.getStackAccessControlContext[native]() is 133,815 ms of process CPU consumption.
>>
>> On Java 16, AccessController.getStackAccessControlContext[native]() is 5,144 ms of process CPU consumption.
>>
>> I wasn't expecting such a huge difference in performance.
>>
>> Total time for the test on Java 8 is 97 seconds.
>>
>> Total time for the test on Java 11 is 1 minute 37 seconds (same as Java 8)
>>
>> Total time for the test on Java 14 is 2 minutes and 1 second.
>>
>> Total time for the test on Java 16 is 1 minute and 36 seconds.
>>
>> Both tests are using TLSv1.3 secure communications.
>>
>> It would seem that Java 16, 8 and 11 are the performance winners in this case, where the above method is less than 0.5% of CPU. Java 14 is around 15% of CPU.
>>
>> Not sure why Java 14 is performing poorly in comparison to other versions, the results are pretty consistent to the second.
>>
>> -- 
>> Regards,
>> Peter Firmstone
>> Zeus Project Services Pty Ltd.
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20210512/578c5531/attachment.htm>


More information about the security-dev mailing list