RFR: 8266459: Implement JEP 411: Deprecate the Security Manager for Removal [v3]
Phil Race
prr at openjdk.java.net
Fri May 21 20:46:03 UTC 2021
On Wed, 19 May 2021 13:47:53 GMT, Weijun Wang <weijun at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Please review this implementation of [JEP 411](https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/411).
>>
>> The code change is divided into 3 commits. Please review them one by one.
>>
>> 1. https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/576161d15423f58281e384174d28c9f9be7941a1 The essential change for this JEP, including the `@Deprecate` annotations and spec change. It also update the default value of the `java.security.manager` system property to "disallow", and necessary test change following this update.
>> 2. https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/26a54a835e9f84aa528740a7c5c35d07355a8a66 Manual changes to several files so that the next commit can be generated programatically.
>> 3. https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/eb6c566ff9207974a03a53335e0e697cffcf0950 Automatic changes to other source files to avoid javac warnings on deprecation for removal
>>
>> The 1st and 2nd commits should be reviewed carefully. The 3rd one is generated programmatically, see the comment below for more details. If you are only interested in a portion of the 3rd commit and would like to review it as a separate file, please comment here and I'll generate an individual webrev.
>>
>> Due to the size of this PR, no attempt is made to update copyright years for any file to minimize unnecessary merge conflict.
>>
>> Furthermore, since the default value of `java.security.manager` system property is now "disallow", most of the tests calling `System.setSecurityManager()` need to launched with `-Djava.security.manager=allow`. This is covered in a different PR at https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/4071.
>>
>> Update: the deprecation annotations and javadoc tags, build, compiler, core-libs, hotspot, i18n, jmx, net, nio, security, and serviceability are reviewed. Rest are 2d, awt, beans, sound, and swing.
>
> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> fixing awt/datatransfer/DataFlavor/DataFlavorRemoteTest.java
I haven't seen any response to this comment I made a couple of days ago and I suspect it got missed
>
> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> fixing awt/datatransfer/DataFlavor/DataFlavorRemoteTest.java
test/jdk/java/awt/datatransfer/DataFlavor/DataFlavorRemoteTest.java line 59:
> 57: ProcessCommunicator
> 58: .executeChildProcess(Consumer.class, new String[0]);
> 59: if (!"Hello".equals(processResults.getStdOut())) {
Who or what prompted this change ?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4073
More information about the security-dev
mailing list