RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v4]
Valerie Peng
valeriep at openjdk.java.net
Wed May 11 22:17:05 UTC 2022
On Tue, 10 May 2022 20:42:55 GMT, Sean Mullan <mullan at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Valerie Peng has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into JDK-8253176
>> - Sync'ed w/ the wording in the other Cipher.getParameters() PR.
>> - Undo un-intentional changes.
>> - 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/SignatureSpi.java line 399:
>
>> 397: * values used by the underlying signature scheme. If the required
>> 398: * parameters were not supplied and can be generated by the signature,
>> 399: * the generated parameters will be returned. Otherwise, {@code null}
>
> Minor wording nit - change "will be" to "are" to be consistent with other wording which uses the present tense. Same comment applies to `Signature.getParameters`.
>
> Also, do we no longer need to mention the part "and the underlying signature implementation supports returning the parameters as {@code AlgorithmParameters}"?
Fixed the nit. Thanks~
As for the part about returning the parameters as `{@code AlgorithmParameters}`, it should be covered by current sentence, i.e. `and can be generated by the signature`. Perhaps we don't have to spell out all possible causes where the parameter can't be generated?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8396
More information about the security-dev
mailing list