RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v4]

Valerie Peng valeriep at openjdk.java.net
Wed May 11 22:17:05 UTC 2022


On Tue, 10 May 2022 20:42:55 GMT, Sean Mullan <mullan at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Valerie Peng has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional commits since the last revision:
>> 
>>  - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into JDK-8253176
>>  - Sync'ed w/ the wording in the other Cipher.getParameters() PR.
>>  - Undo un-intentional changes.
>>  - 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/SignatureSpi.java line 399:
> 
>> 397:      * values used by the underlying signature scheme. If the required
>> 398:      * parameters were not supplied and can be generated by the signature,
>> 399:      * the generated parameters will be returned. Otherwise, {@code null}
> 
> Minor wording nit - change "will be" to "are" to be consistent with other wording which uses the present tense. Same comment applies to `Signature.getParameters`.
> 
> Also, do we no longer need to mention the part "and the underlying signature implementation supports returning the parameters as {@code AlgorithmParameters}"?

Fixed the nit. Thanks~
As for the part about returning the parameters as `{@code AlgorithmParameters}`, it should be covered by current sentence, i.e. `and can be generated by the signature`. Perhaps we don't have to spell out all possible causes where the parameter can't be generated?

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8396



More information about the security-dev mailing list