RFR: JDK-8284688 Minor cleanup could be done in java.security.jgss [v7]

[Mark Powers]

On Wed, 18 May 2022 04:47:13 GMT, Mark Powers <duke at openjdk.java.net> wrote:

>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284688
>> 
>> [JDK-8273046](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8273046) is the umbrella bug for this bug. The changes were too large for a single code review, so it was decided to split into smaller chunks. This is one such chunk: 
>> 
>> open/src/java.security.jgss/share/classes/javax/security 
>> open/src/java.security.jgss/share/classes/org/ietf 
>> open/src/java.security.jgss/share/classes/sun/security
>
> Mark Powers has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 18 commits:
> 
>  - Merge
>  - reverse IntelliJ unboxing suggestion
>  - Merge
>  - Merge
>  - Merge
>  - Brad comments
>  - Max comments
>  - sixth iteration
>  - Merge
>  - fifth iteration
>  - ... and 8 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/2ed75be6...30ca27a2

IntelliJ complains that unboxed values should be boxed, e.g. `Integer.valueOf()` should be changed to `Integer`. After some discussion, it has been decided to ignore IntelliJ's complaints and leave the code as written. To box or unbox is a matter of personal preference. The generated byte code is the same either way.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7746