RFR: 8296408: Make the PCSCException public accessible
Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
xuelei at openjdk.org
Wed Nov 23 03:24:58 UTC 2022
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 02:59:47 GMT, Michael StJohns <mstjohns at comcast.net> wrote:
> … CardException doesn't always pass through the details in a comprehensible way from the underlying cause, …
Does it sound like a cause that the public APIs are not sufficient? Alternatively, if it is possible to update the public APIs instead?
Best,
Xuelei
> On Nov 22, 2022, at 6:59 PM, mlbridge[bot] ***@***.***> wrote:
>
>
> Mailing list message from Michael StJohns ***@***.***> on security-dev ***@***.***>:
>
> On 11/17/2022 10:27 PM, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>
> Hi - Sorry - just getting back to the list after a few days away.
>
> Given that this is a plugin provider for the PCSC access classes, and
> that CardException doesn't always pass through the details in a
> comprehensible way from the underlying cause, having access to
> PCSCException makes a lot of sense, and as far as I can tell is not a
> violation of the general plugin contract.
>
> To make it even more useful, adding a "public long getErrorCode()"
> method to PCSCException would help with the cases where a code that
> isn't actually an? SCard* related code causing the PCSC exception.
>
> But -
>
> Wouldn't this also require a change to the module definition file?
>
> Mike
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/11012#issuecomment-1324485877>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQSB3EAII4OJ5UKKSZQAJHDWJWCC5ANCNFSM6AAAAAARY2PXGY>.
> You are receiving this because you commented.
>
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11012
More information about the security-dev
mailing list