RFR: 8307160: [REDO] Enable the permissive- flag on the Microsoft Visual C compiler [v2]

Julian Waters jwaters at openjdk.org
Wed Aug 9 11:31:29 UTC 2023

On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 06:37:10 GMT, Thomas Stuefe <stuefe at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Julian Waters has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 22 additional commits since the last revision:
>>  - Mismatched declaration in D3DGlyphCache.cpp
>>  - Fields in awt_TextComponent.cpp
>>  - reinterpret_cast needed in AccessBridgeJavaEntryPoints.cpp
>>  - Qualifiers in awt_PrintDialog.h should be removed
>>  - Likewise for awt_DnDDT.cpp
>>  - awt_ole.h include order issue in awt_DnDDS.cpp
>>  - Revert awt_ole.h
>>  - Earlier fix in awt_ole.h was not complete
>>  - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into patch-10
>>  - Likewise for awt_Frame.cpp
>>  - ... and 12 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/7b4bc18a...51230f3d
> src/java.desktop/windows/native/libawt/windows/awt_TextComponent.cpp line 59:
>> 57: AwtTextComponent::OleCallback AwtTextComponent::sm_oleCallback;
>> 58: WNDPROC AwtTextComponent::sm_pDefWindowProc = NULL;
>> 59: 
> Did the compiler complain here? I'm fine with the change, just wanted to know the reason.

the latter two are inside an extern "C" block, meaning their initial C++ linkage (by virtue of them being static class members) conflicts with the now C linkage, also the comment there states the AwtComponent fields are supposed to be set here, and I have no idea why this was not done, so I moved them all to be under that comment


PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15096#discussion_r1288325155

More information about the security-dev mailing list