RFR: 8318096: Introduce AsymmetricKey interface with a getParams method [v5]

[Weijun Wang]

On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 17:08:27 GMT, Sean Mullan <mullan at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   use @inheritDoc
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/interfaces/RSAPrivateKey.java line 74:
> 
>> 72:      */
>> 73:     @Override
>> 74:     default AlgorithmParameterSpec getParams() {
> 
> What is the benefit of overriding this method if it returns the same type?

Otherwise, there will be an error `interface RSAPrivateKey inherits unrelated defaults for getParams() from types AsymmetricKey and RSAKey`. I think this is because `RSAKey` is not a `Key`.

> src/jdk.crypto.cryptoki/share/classes/sun/security/pkcs11/P11Key.java line 902:
> 
>> 900:         }
>> 901: 
>> 902:         public DSAParams getParams() {
> 
> Suggest adding an `@Override` annotation here and below to make it more clear this is an overridden method.

There are a lot of places in this class without `@Override`. Shall I add all of them or just the 2 places I touched this time?

> test/jdk/java/security/Signature/GetParams.java line 1:
> 
>> 1: /*
> 
> Why is this test in the Signature directory? Should it just be in the java/security dir?

It should not be in Signature. The java/security dir has only subdirs and no test. Maybe I create a new AsymmetricKey dir and move it there?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16222#discussion_r1373502707
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16222#discussion_r1373500436
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16222#discussion_r1373505291