RFR: 8344144: AES/CBC slow at big payloads [v2]
Ferenc Rakoczi
duke at openjdk.org
Thu Nov 14 10:12:45 UTC 2024
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:44:35 GMT, Volodymyr Paprotski <vpaprotski at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Measuring throughput with JMH parameters `-f 1 -i 2 -wi 3 -r 20 -w 30 -p algorithm=AES/CBC/NoPadding -p dataSize=30000000 -p provider=SunJCE -p keyLength=128 org.openjdk.bench.javax.crypto.full.AESBench`
>>
>> Before:
>>
>> Benchmark (algorithm) (dataSize) (keyLength) (provider) Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>> AESBench.decrypt AES/CBC/NoPadding 30000000 128 SunJCE thrpt 2 25.383 ops/s
>> AESBench.decrypt2 AES/CBC/NoPadding 30000000 128 SunJCE thrpt 2 32.230 ops/s
>> AESBench.encrypt AES/CBC/NoPadding 30000000 128 SunJCE thrpt 2 20.489 ops/s
>> AESBench.encrypt2 AES/CBC/NoPadding 30000000 128 SunJCE thrpt 2 21.383 ops/s
>>
>>
>> After:
>>
>> Benchmark (algorithm) (dataSize) (keyLength) (provider) Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>> AESBench.decrypt AES/CBC/NoPadding 30000000 128 SunJCE thrpt 2 215.144 ops/s
>> AESBench.decrypt2 AES/CBC/NoPadding 30000000 128 SunJCE thrpt 2 411.265 ops/s
>> AESBench.encrypt AES/CBC/NoPadding 30000000 128 SunJCE thrpt 2 64.341 ops/s
>> AESBench.encrypt2 AES/CBC/NoPadding 30000000 128 SunJCE thrpt 2 73.114 ops/s
>>
>>
>> I have not deterministically proven why chunking works: before the change, the CBC intrinsic is not being used; and after chunking, it is. There is quite a bit of GC activity in the default AESBench, so `encrypt2/decrypt2` versions isolate just crypto (see comment below).
>
> Volodymyr Paprotski has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> comments from Kevin
> I have not deterministically proven why chunking works: before the change, the CBC intrinsic is not being used; and after chunking, it is.
I think this is exactly the reason for the speedup. It takes quite a few calls before hotspot switches to the intrinsic.
Was this a problem in a real-world application, or just in the benchmark?
The change looks good to me.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22086#issuecomment-2475926066
More information about the security-dev
mailing list