RFR: 8331008: Implement JEP 478: Key Derivation Function API (Preview) [v24]

Kevin Driver kdriver at openjdk.org
Fri Sep 6 18:02:34 UTC 2024


On Fri, 6 Sep 2024 12:51:10 GMT, Viktor Klang <vklang at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Kevin Driver has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 31 additional commits since the last revision:
>> 
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into kdf-jep-wip
>>    # Please enter a commit message to explain why this merge is necessary,
>>    # especially if it merges an updated upstream into a topic branch.
>>    #
>>    # Lines starting with '#' will be ignored, and an empty message aborts
>>    # the commit.
>>  - several more review comments
>>  - change impl class to use byte arrays rather than SecretKey objects where possible
>>  - updated delayed provider selection javadoc
>>  - review comments
>>  - use a delegate record to hold the spi and provider
>>  - assorted review comment changes
>>  - another round of review comments
>>  - consistency with wording for addIKM and addSalt
>>  - another round of code review comments
>>  - ... and 21 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/511a2b2a...a35e98c9
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/com/sun/crypto/provider/HkdfKeyDerivation.java line 70:
> 
>> 68:      */
>> 69:     HkdfKeyDerivation(String hmacAlgName, int hmacLen,
>> 70:                       KDFParameters kdfParameters)
> 
> Why does this take KDFParameters if hmacAlgName doesn't support parameters?

This block is contained in the `KDFSpi` class header:


 * In addition, all implementations must provide a public constructor which
 * accepts a {@code KDFParameters} object. The constructor must call {@code
 * super(params)} passing the parameters supplied. The constructor must also
 * throw an {@code InvalidAlgorithmParameterException} if the supplied
 * parameters are inappropriate.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20301#discussion_r1747520868


More information about the security-dev mailing list