RFR: 8347067: Load certificates without explicit trust settings in KeyChainStore [v5]
Sean Mullan
mullan at openjdk.org
Tue Apr 1 15:28:35 UTC 2025
On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 22:43:32 GMT, Tim Jacomb <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> ## The change
>>
>> Without this change intermediate certificates that don't have explicit trust settings are ignored not added to the truststore.
>>
>>
>>
>> ## Reproducer
>>
>> See https://github.com/timja/openjdk-intermediate-ca-reproducer
>>
>> Without this change the reproducer fails, and with this change it succeeds.
>>
>> ## Example failing architecture
>>
>> Root CA -> Intermediate 1 -> Intermediate 2 -> Leaf
>>
>> Where:
>> * All certs are in admin domain kSecTrustSettingsDomainAdmin
>> * Root CA is marked as always trust
>> * Intermediate 1 and 2 are Unspecified
>>
>> Previously Root CA would be found but intermediate 1 and 2 would be skipped when verifying trust settings.
>>
>> ## Background reading
>>
>> ### Rust
>> see also Rust Lib that is used throughout Rust ecosystem for this:
>> https://github.com/rustls/rustls-native-certs/blob/efe7b1d77bf6080851486535664d1dc7ef0dea68/src/macos.rs#L39-L58
>>
>> e.g. in Deno `https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/11491` where I've verified it is correctly implemented and works in my setup
>>
>> ## Python
>>
>> I also looked at the Python implementation for inspiration as well (which also works on my system): https://github.com/sethmlarson/truststore/blob/main/src/truststore/_macos.py
>
> Tim Jacomb has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Make test output easier to read
I am dubious that this is the right thing to do. There is a distinct difference between a certificate that is trusted and one that requires additional validation to determine if it is trusted. Blindly trusting self-signed certificates is very dangeorous, and unless I am mistaken, this seems to be what this code may do. I do not think lumping both of these certificates into "trusted" certificates is the right thing to do.
It may mean that we need to enhance the `KeyStore` API to be able to store arbitrary certificates. Or you could consider storing these additional certificates in a `CertStore`.
I am also not sure the use case is common. Typically a web server will send its entire chain, and not just the server certificate.
Certainly open to hearing alternate opinions if I have overlooked something.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22911#issuecomment-2769754872
More information about the security-dev
mailing list