RFR: 8325448: Hybrid Public Key Encryption [v15]
Sean Mullan
mullan at openjdk.org
Mon Apr 14 17:56:53 UTC 2025
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 20:41:13 GMT, Weijun Wang <weijun at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Implement HPKE as defined in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9180/.
>> 
>
> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> toString, exportData, spec in HPKEParameters must have algorithm identifiers specified
src/java.base/share/classes/javax/crypto/spec/HPKEParameterSpec.java line 78:
> 76: * {@link #info(byte[])} method by both sides.
> 77: * <li>
> 78: * If HPKE modes {@code mode_auth} or {@code mode_auth_psk} are used,
This could be reworded as: "To use the HPKE modes {@code mode_auth} ..."
src/java.base/share/classes/javax/crypto/spec/snippet-files/PackageSnippets.java line 35:
> 33: public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
> 34: // @start region="hpke-spec-example"
> 35: // Key pair generation
Comment should note this is the recipient's key pair.
src/java.base/share/classes/javax/crypto/spec/snippet-files/PackageSnippets.java line 46:
> 44: sender.init(Cipher.ENCRYPT_MODE, kp.getPublic(), ps);
> 45:
> 46: // Retrieve the actual parameters used from the sender.
I think it would be more clear if you didn't name the cipher objects `sender` and `recipient` because there can be confusion as to whether you mean the cipher objects or the sender/receiver entities.
src/java.base/share/classes/javax/crypto/spec/snippet-files/PackageSnippets.java line 64:
> 62: recipient.init(Cipher.DECRYPT_MODE, kp.getPrivate(), pr);
> 63:
> 64: // Secure communication between the 2 sides
There is no secure communication in the code below. I would remove/change this comment.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18411#discussion_r2042597344
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18411#discussion_r2042605774
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18411#discussion_r2042611506
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18411#discussion_r2042620693
More information about the security-dev
mailing list