RFR: 8359956: Support algorithm constraints and certificate checks in SunX509 key manager [v15]

[Hao Sun]

On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 21:00:44 GMT, Artur Barashev <abarashev at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> SunX509 key manager should support the same certificate checks that are supported by PKIX key manager.
>> 
>> Effectively there should be only 2 differences between 2 key managers:
>> - PKIX supports multiple key stores through KeyStore.Builder interface while SunX509 supports only a single keystore.
>> - SunX509 caches its whole key store on initialization thus improving performance. This means that subsequent modifications of the KeyStore have no effect on SunX509 KM, unlike PKIX .
>> 
>> **SUNX509 KeyManager performance before the change**
>> Benchmark                                    (resume)  (tlsVersion)   Mode  Cnt      Score     Error  Units
>> SSLHandshake.doHandshake      true       TLSv1.2  thrpt   15  19758.012 ± 758.237  ops/s
>> SSLHandshake.doHandshake      true           TLS  thrpt   15   1861.695 ±  14.681  ops/s
>> SSLHandshake.doHandshake     false       TLSv1.2  thrpt   15   **1186.962** ±  12.085  ops/s
>> SSLHandshake.doHandshake     false           TLS  thrpt   15   **1056.288** ±   7.197  ops/s
>> 
>> **SUNX509 KeyManager performance after the change**
>> Benchmark                 (resume)  (tlsVersion)   Mode  Cnt      Score     Error  Units
>> SSLHandshake.doHandshake      true       TLSv1.2  thrpt   15  20954.399 ± 260.817  ops/s
>> SSLHandshake.doHandshake      true           TLS  thrpt   15   1813.401 ±  13.917  ops/s
>> SSLHandshake.doHandshake     false       TLSv1.2  thrpt   15   **1158.190** ±   6.023  ops/s
>> SSLHandshake.doHandshake     false           TLS  thrpt   15   **1012.988** ±  10.943  ops/s
>
> Artur Barashev has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Review fixes

Hi I found that `test/jdk/javax/management/security/SecurityTest.java` failed after this patch on both AArch64 and x86_64. Filed in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8364495. I was wondering if you could help take a look at this issue? Thanks.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25016#issuecomment-3141799952