RFR: 8298420: PEM API: Implementation (Preview) [v17]
Sean Mullan
mullan at openjdk.org
Mon May 12 20:46:47 UTC 2025
On Sun, 11 May 2025 19:02:55 GMT, Anthony Scarpino <ascarpino at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I need a code review of the PEM API. Privacy-Enhanced Mail (PEM) is a format for encoding and decoding cryptographic keys and certificates. It will be integrated into JDK24 as a Preview Feature. Preview features does not permanently define the API and it is subject to change in future releases until it is finalized.
>>
>> Details about this change can be seen at [PEM API JEP](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8300911).
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Tony
>
> Anthony Scarpino has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> comments on the 11th
src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/PEMRecord.java line 116:
> 114: *
> 115: * @param type the type identifier in the PEM header and footer, or {@code null} if there is no PEM data.
> 116: * @param pem The data between the PEM header and footer.
s/The/the/
src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/PEMRecord.java line 116:
> 114: *
> 115: * @param type the type identifier in the PEM header and footer, or {@code null} if there is no PEM data.
> 116: * @param pem The data between the PEM header and footer.
This should say "the base64-encoded data ..."
src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/PEMRecord.java line 129:
> 127: *
> 128: * @param type the type identifier in the PEM header and footer, or {@code null} if there is no PEM data.
> 129: * @param pem the data between the PEM header and footer.
I thought the bytes were the DER encoded data. Wouldn't that be useful, if you were trying to PEM encode a certificate with extra leading data, for example?
src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/PEMRecord.java line 142:
> 140: *
> 141: * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code pem} cannot be decoded.
> 142: * @return Returns a new array of the binary encoding each time this
Remove "Returns".
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17543#discussion_r2085418309
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17543#discussion_r2085421719
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17543#discussion_r2085423396
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17543#discussion_r2085412731
More information about the security-dev
mailing list