RFR: 8345954: Revisit Class Initializers and Locking in X509TrustManagerImpl [v2]
Koushik Muthukrishnan Thirupattur
duke at openjdk.org
Tue Jan 27 21:50:55 UTC 2026
On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 11:08:10 GMT, Mikhail Yankelevich <myankelevich at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Koushik Muthukrishnan Thirupattur has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8345954: Addressing review comments
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/provider/X509Factory.java line 188:
>
>> 186: enc = newC.getEncodedInternal();
>> 187: }
>> 188: return addIfNotPresent(certCache, enc, newC);
>
> Nit: what do you think about moving this logic inside of the `addIfNotPresent` and just pass an option if it is an impl?
>
> X509CertImpl newC;
> byte[] enc;
> if (isImpl) {
> newC = (X509CertImpl) c;
> enc = encoding;
> } else {
> newC = new X509CertImpl(encoding);
> enc = newC.getEncodedInternal();
> }
> return addIfNotPresent(certCache, enc, newC);
>
>
> I think this might be a bit easier to follow then. But I don't really mind if you leave it this way either
Good suggestion. But I am thinking to keep addIfNotPresent() as a generic cache helper without specific construction logic inside.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29181#discussion_r2733956670
More information about the security-dev
mailing list