8034856/8034857: More gcc warnings

[Mikael Vidstedt]

On 2014-02-17 07:08, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 17/02/2014 05:51, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
>>
>> I'm inclined to agree with this. Since the code depends on a specific 
>> behavior of isspace which does not match what the system provided 
>> function does I too think it would be more robust to implement our 
>> own version of it.
> I completely agree that changing this code to use its own isspace is 
> the right thing, it just seems a bit much for a drive-by fixed to gcc 
> warnings. Do either of you want to take it?

How about:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mikael/webrevs/isspace/webrev.00/webrev/

Cheers,
Mikael

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20140217/0cf3246b/attachment.html