Let jvmtiGen exit with a non-zero exit code upon failure
serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
Fri Oct 30 22:16:30 UTC 2015
Agreed.
This makes sense.
Carsten,
Does this approach looks better to you?
If so, could you, please, change your webrev accordingly?
I do not want to push a different fix under your name.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 10/30/15 04:33, Staffan Larsen wrote:
> I realize now that the code can be simplified even more. If we remove
> all the exception-catches and just let any exceptions propagate out of
> main(), then the java executable will terminate with a non-zero exit
> value if an exception is thrown. I don’t think the code in the
> exception handlers add any significant functionality. If you do this,
> then you don’t need to keep track of the “cleanRun” variable.
>
> /Staffan
>
>> On 30 okt. 2015, at 10:12, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
>> <mailto:serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Carsten,
>>
>> The fix looks good.
>> I'll push it as soon as I get a time.
>>
>> New bug filed:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8141035
>>
>> Feel free to update it if necessary.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Serguei
>>
>>
>> On 10/29/15 17:00, Carsten Varming wrote:
>>> Dear Serguei and Steffan,
>>>
>>> Thank you for the reviews. I have updated the webrev at
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cvarming/jvmtiGen . I haven't been able
>>> to log into JBS yet, so please go ahead and create bug id for this
>>> change.
>>>
>>> Dan: Thank you for forwarding this email to the proper alias.
>>>
>>> Carsten
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 6:44 PM, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
>>> <serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com <mailto:serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Carsten,
>>>
>>> I forgot to thank you for taking care about this issue!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Serguei
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/29/15 15:41, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
>>> <mailto:serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Carsten,
>>>
>>> The fix looks good.
>>> I share the Staffan's comments though.
>>> If understand correctly, you do not have an openjdk author
>>> status yet.
>>>
>>> I will sponsor your fix.
>>> Please, let me know the bug ID after you create one.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Serguei
>>>
>>>
>>> Please, let me know
>>>
>>> On 10/29/15 14:22, Staffan Larsen wrote:
>>>
>>> Carsten,
>>>
>>> This looks good with a few comments:
>>>
>>> 1) If you make the “verbose” variable into a static
>>> field, you can avoid the final-copying.
>>> 2) nit: Line 216: put "System.exit(1);” on it’s own line
>>>
>>> Oh, and create a bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net
>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> /Staffan
>>>
>>> On 29 okt. 2015, at 14:54, Daniel D. Daugherty
>>> <daniel.daugherty at oracle.com
>>> <mailto:daniel.daugherty at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> JVM/TI belongs to the Serviceability team so adding
>>> serviceability-dev at ...
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/28/15 8:45 PM, Carsten Varming wrote:
>>>
>>> webrev:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cvarming/jvmtiGen/
>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ecvarming/jvmtiGen/>
>>> bug: ?
>>>
>>> jvmtiGen is used to process a number of xml and
>>> xslt files in OpenJDK.
>>> Currently jvmtiGen exits with exit code 0
>>> regardless of its success. This
>>> causes make to often consider a target finished
>>> when in fact the target
>>> failed. It also leads to funny error checking
>>> after the execution of
>>> jvmtiGen. For instance, in many trace.make
>>> files[*] a test for the
>>> existence of the output file is carried out
>>> after the completion of
>>> jvmtiGen. In a clean working repository that
>>> test is equivalent to jvmtiGen
>>> exiting with a proper exit failure code on
>>> failure, but in a dirty working
>>> repository the target file might just be
>>> pre-existing. This causes
>>> unnecessary pain when working with files
>>> processed by jvmtiGen.
>>>
>>> In this change I chose to exit with exit code 1
>>> whenever a failure is
>>> detected, be it a dtd validation failure, an IO
>>> failure, or something else
>>> entirely. This halts the building of OpenJDK on
>>> failures and ultimately
>>> makes development easier. I also added a verbose
>>> option such that warnings
>>> from the xml parser and dtd checker can be
>>> printed on stderr if desired.
>>> Finally, I changed all the error message
>>> printing to stderr. :-)
>>>
>>> Let me know what you think.
>>>
>>> BTW. This is the first time I tried the webrev
>>> system, so hopefully it all
>>> looks good. I havn't figured out how to create a
>>> bug yet, whence the
>>> question mark.
>>>
>>> I wasn't sure if hotspot-runtime-dev is the
>>> right email alias. Please let
>>> me know if there is a more appropriate alias for
>>> this email.
>>>
>>> [*] Why are so many of the non-shared makefiles
>>> almost identical?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20151030/e97b9dc3/attachment.html>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list