RFR 8183123 : JDP packets have no processId context set

Andrew Leonard andrew_m_leonard at uk.ibm.com
Thu Jun 29 16:15:52 UTC 2017


Thanks Christoph,
Yes, jdk_management group all pass :-)

==============================
Test summary
==============================
   TEST                                                           TOTAL 
PASS  FAIL ERROR 
   jtreg:jdk/test:jdk_management                       129   129     0 0 
==============================
TEST SUCCESS

Cheers
Andrew

Andrew Leonard
Java Runtimes Development
IBM Hursley
IBM United Kingdom Ltd
Phone internal: 245913, external: 01962 815913
internet email: andrew_m_leonard at uk.ibm.com 




From:   "Langer, Christoph" <christoph.langer at sap.com>
To:     Andrew Leonard <andrew_m_leonard at uk.ibm.com>
Cc:     "serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net" 
<serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net>
Date:   29/06/2017 15:38
Subject:        RE: RFR 8183123 : JDP packets have no processId context 
set



Hi Andrew,
 
the fix looks ok to me. I will sponsor it after we get another review.
 
The copyright years need to be updated but I can do that before pushing. 
In the test I think it looks nicer to put the new “import static …” line 
with one line of spacing to the others. But that’s maybe my personal 
taste. I could rearrange that before pushing if you like.
 
Did you run the jtreg tests, e.g. group ‘jdk_management’?
 
Best regards
Christoph
 
From: serviceability-dev [
mailto:serviceability-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Andrew 
Leonard
Sent: Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2017 15:57
To: serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: RFR 8183123 : JDP packets have no processId context set
 
Hi All, 
Please can I get some review feedback for my changes for this issue: 
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8183123 
The webrev patch has been uploaded here: 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8183123.0/ 

Essentially the fix entails: 
- Replacing invalid process id query logic with call to 
ProcessHandle.current().getPid(). 
- Update testcase to cover the failing scenario. Thus it fails without my 
patch, and succeeds with it. 

Thanks 
Andrew 

Andrew Leonard
Java Runtimes Development
IBM Hursley
IBM United Kingdom Ltd
Phone internal: 245913, external: 01962 815913
internet email: andrew_m_leonard at uk.ibm.com 

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU


Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20170629/736b5b0d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list