RFR 8215050: [TESTBUG] serviceability/tmtools/jstack/WaitNotifyThreadTest.java fails when run with flag -Xcomp

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Tue Dec 11 04:50:50 UTC 2018


<sigh> This is still failing in tier4:

Error: incorrect monitor info: locked, a java.lang.Object, 
0x000000078653eeb0
Expected: locked, a java.lang.Object, no object reference available

Looks like the presence/absence of an address is contingent on other 
things ??

"MyWaitingThread" #13 prio=5 os_prio=0 cpu=0.27ms elapsed=2.63s 
tid=0x00007f522c009000 nid=0x62d0 in Object.wait()  [0x00007f526537d000]
    java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
Thread: 0x00007f522c009000  [0x62d0] State: _at_safepoint 
_has_called_back 0 _at_poll_safepoint 0
    JavaThread state: _thread_blocked
	at java.lang.Object.wait(java.base at 12-internal/Native Method)
	- waiting on <no object reference available>
	at java.lang.Object.wait(java.base at 12-internal/Object.java:328)
	at WaitNotifyThreadTest$WaitThread.run(WaitNotifyThreadTest.java:80)
	- locked <0x000000078653eeb0> (a java.lang.Object)

Or maybe there is a bug in the stack printing code thats printing the 
information?

Filed: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215199

David
-----

On 9/12/2018 9:21 am, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Patricio,
> 
> On 9/12/2018 9:04 am, Patricio Chilano wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could you review this small fix for test 
>> serviceability/tmtools/jstack/WaitNotifyThreadTest.java ?
>> After change 8214148 the test fails if the flag -Xcomp is used as 
>> explained in the bug details. The proposed change is to identified 
>> this special case and set the monitor address to match the one expected.
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchilanomate/8215050.02/webrev/
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215050
>>
>> Run tier-4 where the test was failing and passed (the test was failing 
>> on tier6 also because it uses -Xcomp too). Currently running tiers1-3.
> 
> Change seems fine. The lack of address must be something relatively new 
> as I don't see it with Xcomp in JDK 9.
> 
> Thanks,
> David
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Patricio


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list