RFR 8171119: Low-Overhead Heap Profiling

serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
Tue May 8 03:49:00 UTC 2018


Hi Jc,

I'll make one more pass through the JVMTI and test fixes.
However, it would be good if at least one more pair of eyes
looked at the tests as they are a big part of the fix.

Thanks,
Serguei


On 5/7/18 19:28, JC Beyler wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> Good catch, I believe it was used before but no longer since we put the
> heap sampler information directly in the thread structure. I removed it for
> the next webrev.
>
> Could anyone do a review on the JVMTI parts and tests?
>
> Thanks a lot for your help!
> Jc
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 6:31 PM Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I did not look on JVMTI part and tests. It looks good to me.
>>
>> Where _thread field is used?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vladimir
>>
>> On 5/7/18 6:10 PM, JC Beyler wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> With the awesome help of Serguei Spitsyn, we have moved forward on the
>>> implementation for JEP-331 and have the following webrev for review:
>>>
>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8171119/heap_event.18/
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171119
>>>
>>> It is based on jdk/jdk so should patch well with a recent tip.
>>>
>>> Could we please have some reviews for the webrev? It would be greatly
>>> appreciated!
>>>
>>> Thanks for all your help!
>>> Jc
>>>



More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list