RFR 8171119: Low-Overhead Heap Profiling
JC Beyler
jcbeyler at google.com
Tue May 8 14:46:09 UTC 2018
Hi Serguei,
Awesome! Thanks for your help and I look forward to your review!
Any takers on the second pair of eyes on the tests? :)
Thanks again all, your help is much appreciated,
Jc
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 8:49 PM serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com <
serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi Jc,
>
> I'll make one more pass through the JVMTI and test fixes.
> However, it would be good if at least one more pair of eyes
> looked at the tests as they are a big part of the fix.
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
>
> On 5/7/18 19:28, JC Beyler wrote:
> > Hi Vladimir,
> >
> > Good catch, I believe it was used before but no longer since we put the
> > heap sampler information directly in the thread structure. I removed it
> for
> > the next webrev.
> >
> > Could anyone do a review on the JVMTI parts and tests?
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your help!
> > Jc
> >
> > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 6:31 PM Vladimir Kozlov <
> vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I did not look on JVMTI part and tests. It looks good to me.
> >>
> >> Where _thread field is used?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Vladimir
> >>
> >> On 5/7/18 6:10 PM, JC Beyler wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> With the awesome help of Serguei Spitsyn, we have moved forward on the
> >>> implementation for JEP-331 and have the following webrev for review:
> >>>
> >>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8171119/heap_event.18/
> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171119
> >>>
> >>> It is based on jdk/jdk so should patch well with a recent tip.
> >>>
> >>> Could we please have some reviews for the webrev? It would be greatly
> >>> appreciated!
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for all your help!
> >>> Jc
> >>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20180508/579552e4/attachment.html>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list